Results of the Antolinez Family Experiment

In only 10 days I got results for the experiment that tried to detect Goog penalization. It turned gone that 2 domains are penalized with a -20 fall. The other result refers to the extent of indexation. It seems that penalized sites receive only superficial indexation. For instance, if a site is well indexed, all the expression strings will be indexed, and searching for phrases within quotes will find them. If the site is badly indexed due to penalization, only individual words will be indexed, and the strings will not be detected. Interesting... The other result is that penalization covers all subjects, still those unrelated to the main one. For instance, a domain penalized for duplicate content will be penalized for content that has nothing to do with the abused content. However, I am not making a difference between penalization types, which probably exists. In the following probation I will cover one domain that was penalized for duplicates and other penalized fo
r linking to malicious neighbourhood. Let"s see if the penalizations are similar. I am instantly working on a modern experiment (3rd of my controlled series) using more domains, mixing penalized with healthy domains. On the other hand, I am analyzing the directories I operate for submission with reciprocal link exchange. It seems that some of them are considered poor neighbours, maybe in that they insert black hat sites, or they sell links, or whatever. My analysis includes only existing factors, on account of I am not free of charge to upload analysis pages to them. There are a uncommon factors that warn you against pathetic directories: deficient ranking in Google while searching for their own Habitat Stage Title or Description, as compared with Yahoo or MSN. Also, rare indexed incoming links, and other parameters. We are trying to establish the most reliable of those parameters. For all the Penalization Detection experiments we necessitate to focus on keywords th
at have 10-200 results. Less, is not enough to detect a fall in rankings. More, are difficult to detect and count. We plan to offer a Guideline Penalization Detection function (exact value), and a Penalization Diagnosis which will try to find an explanation for the issue. In most cases we detect wick linking, code problems or duplicate contents that explained the enigma and could be corrected. Full text: http://computerandtechnologies.com/search-engine-optimization/news_2008-10-23-13-00-04-116.html